Battlefield 4 Launch Fiasco

PatchRowcester

Registered User
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
83
I guess you all knew this was coming. There is just no win in this situation for gamers. I blame myself for wasting my money. I should have been smarter. If you are a potential buyer of BF4, I must warn you, there are many problems. I should hope they will be fixed, but at the moment, its not worth spending the money. Read on for the details.

I will be posting this on other forums as well. Hopefully this will get enough attention to warrant a change.

Or maybe not, and I just wasted 1 hour writing this.

For pictures and videos, click here

The launch of Battlefield 4 was very disappointing. It felt as if those who pre ordered the game were paying to beta test it. It was such a broken mess at times, that I find it hard to believe they released it in such a state. Problems in the beta are present in the release version. Makes me wonder what the beta accomplished.

To an extent I understand the server side problems which were taken care of as quickly as they possibly could, but some issues with the base game are hard to justify.

After their PC patch, things seemed to have gotten worse. Apart from the usual problems with the game (crashing to the desktop at random), they managed to introduce a new bug in the patch which could cause the screen to blur every time the commander deployed an EMP. So not only does EA/DICE make customer feel stupid for pre ordering the game, they made it physically hurt them.

The battlefield twitter and Facebook feed is full of advertisements ranging from merchandise to review scores. Apart from a few employees at DICE who have taken the time to respond to messages (my sincere thanks to them). One wonders why they didn't publicly acknowledge the problems and apologize, instead of carrying on with the shameless promotion and self congratulatory posts.

After the terrible launch, instead of reaching out to the customers, EA took the classy route and advertised hoodies.

Understandably, customers were not pleased.

This launch has validated the cynicism towards the gaming industry in general. If they were in tune with the community, they would know that the community doesn't care about when the game launched or if it beat Call of Duty at sales figures. They care about having a playable game.

I am sure this is hard for an executive to comprehend, because for them, its all about sales figures. They throw around buzz words like "seamless reality", "immersion", and best of all, "levelolution" without knowing the first thing about gaming. Publishers do not care about the what they are selling, as long as they are selling many of it, and will say anything to reach their goal - even lie to the public. Case in point, Patrick Bach's interview with Jack Frags about how the game features "improved netcode" and how people will notice the difference because its better. In reality, it was far worse than Battlefield 3.

So here is the bottomline, I will not pre order the next Battlefield game (rest assured that there will be another BF game. The series has gotten too big to not have many sequels), or an EA product. I blame myself for not waiting to see how the game turns out. They have given me no incentive to support their product (No, battlepacks aren't incentives - a working game is.)

I hope someone at EA who is in a position to change things will read this, and hopefully put out better games. They have a tough job ahead of convincing fans that they can be trusted.
 
Haven't been able to play ONE SINGLE ROUND since EVER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Crashes on me as soon as the server title page comes on............
 
You're not giving them sufficient credit for being consistent....

I think you are right about this. They are at least consistently patching the game, and rolling out server updates. Hopefully, they will learn a few lessons for future releases.

That being said, as a customer, I don't know if buying games at launch is worth the money anymore.
 
I think you are right about this. They are at least consistently patching the game, and rolling out server updates. Hopefully, they will learn a few lessons for future releases.

That being said, as a customer, I don't know if buying games at launch is worth the money anymore.

Actually at launch you are getting 99% of the code.........the rest comes in the patches until the game functions for ALL of us..........kinda like playing chess through the mail.
 
Actually at launch you are getting 99% of the code.........the rest comes in the patches until the game functions for ALL of us..........kinda like playing chess through the mail.

True, and that's a little worrying isn't it? I mean if the base game has this many problems, can they ever really fix it?
 
True, and that's a little worrying isn't it? I mean if the base game has this many problems, can they ever really fix it?

No, the existing problems stretching back to BF2 are a testament to that. I mean, it's not limited to Dice/EA, I think the gaming community in general would be shocked about a release that had no (or very very few) issues. I think the BF4 developers were a wee bit aggressive (running on tablets, phones, abacus, etc.). Stick with one or two platforms, don't try to be all things to all people (dumbing it down to appease THOSE OTHER "GAMERS"). My biggest complaint about BF4 (when it works) is that you are allllwwwayyysssss spotted. But hey, that's what people wanted :(
 
I think the BF4 developers were a wee bit aggressive (running on tablets, phones, abacus, etc.). Stick with one or two platforms, don't try to be all things to all people (dumbing it down to appease THOSE OTHER "GAMERS").

Problem is the developers don't make decisions like this. Everyone cried commander and EA in their push for mobile saw an opportunity. The day DICE sold to EA was the day DICE stopped making decisions. EA tells you what game your making and when it is due, you might make some decisions inside of that but just about anything important is back and forth and requires approval. If every person at DICE wanted to make 2143 they still would have made Battlefield 4 instead. EA said so.

The world is lucky that both Battlefield and CoD haven't gone purely vampire on zombie combat. The majority of companies intend to drag that genre as far as it will go and the facebook generation of idiots is plenty happy to make it seem profitable. If there is anything hot right now that isn't modern combat EA won't see it as future combat but they might bite into the bs everyone else is putting out.
 
Good news is that BF4 will become a gem in the coming weeks err... months? I don't even waste energy logging into BF4 these days, performance is absolutely crappy and the stuttering is unbearable - even though my specs are more than capable (gtx 570, i5 2500k, 8gb ram). On the lowest of settings it's atrocious performance.

Battlefield 3 and Bad Company 2 fill my battlefield void for now, lol.

EA a.k.a. the antichrist of gaming is responsible for this, as a result of their greedy goal to beat COD to the shelves by a week, but non the less, I have full faith in dice making the game incredible in time.
 
That screen blur makes me want to takes a human life.
ejubeja2.jpg


Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top