Don't listen to him Mac; my students/peers never hated me. Regardless, don't run from your opinion. You are wrestling with whether to make the essay factual or opinionated, which I think is an error. Now you don't want hyperbole because that just makes any argument you present easily dismissed as the work of an ideologue. But do not run from your opinion; the moment you pick a topic you have expressed an opinion. The trick is to craft your perspective subtly, picking your evidence to show the entire picture but keeping your opinion strong. In short present a thorough argument but remember that your opinion is what matters most; you are the writer. If you do that then you will have some better flow and the transitions will be easier. Overall I like the entry; you do not like the idea but show that if it is law we must not run from the consequences. In short quit playing to the sound bite and man up. There is much in the essay you could expound on and it could easily be the basis for a multitude of entries. I would say more but I do not want you to think I'm just being an ass.
Full disclosure: my BA is in US History and my graduate work was in US Intellectual History (a combination of history, literature, and philosophy) with an emphasis on the interplay of systemic changes (mainly economic and social) on the development of government. I spent two years as a TA at FSU and then taught AP and honors high school history for nine years. And I may have edited a few of sixer's essays.